- 07-Nov-2025
- public international law
In extradition cases, Indian courts often rely on documents and evidence submitted by the requesting country, including judgments from foreign courts. These judgments help establish a prima facie case against the accused. However, their admissibility is governed by legal standards outlined in India’s Extradition Act, 1962, and relevant bilateral or multilateral treaties. Indian courts must balance the principles of judicial fairness, evidentiary rules, and international cooperation when considering foreign judgments.
Section 10 of the Extradition Act allows Indian courts to accept authenticated documents, including judgments of conviction or warrants, from the requesting country, as long as they are certified by an authorized judicial or diplomatic officer.
For a foreign judgment to be admissible, it must be:
Signed by a judge or magistrate.
Authenticated by an oath or affidavit.
Certified by an Indian diplomatic or consular officer stationed in the foreign country.
The foreign judgment must help establish a prima facie case—meaning there is enough evidence to suggest the accused committed the offense. Indian courts do not retry the case but assess whether the accusation is legally justified for extradition.
While admissible, foreign judgments are not treated as final proof of guilt. They are part of the overall documentation considered by the Extradition Magistrate in forming an opinion.
If India has an extradition treaty or reciprocal arrangement with the requesting country, foreign court judgments have stronger evidentiary value and are more likely to be accepted in the extradition process.
Indian courts have held that while Indian law requires a prima facie case, they must also respect international comity and not overly scrutinize foreign judicial processes unless there are concerns of injustice or human rights violations.
Documents must be accompanied by accurate English translations certified as true copies.
If the judgment violates Indian constitutional principles or indicates possible human rights abuses, extradition may be denied.
Indian law bars extradition for political or military offenses, even if a judgment exists.
A person is convicted of cybercrime in the USA and escapes to India. The U.S. government requests extradition, providing a certified copy of the conviction judgment from a U.S. District Court.
The U.S. judgment is authenticated by the U.S. court and certified by the Indian Consulate.
The Indian Central Government forwards the request to an Extradition Magistrate.
The magistrate reviews the judgment and supporting documents.
The court determines that the foreign judgment and related evidence establish a prima facie case.
The magistrate commits the accused to custody and submits the report to the Central Government for a final decision.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
