In any product liability case, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (the consumer) to prove their case. This means the consumer must provide sufficient evidence to support their claims that the product was defective, that the defect caused their injury, and that the manufacturer or seller is legally responsible. The burden of proof refers to the obligation of the party bringing the lawsuit (the plaintiff) to present enough evidence to convince the court of their claims.
In product liability cases, the burden of proof is usually on the consumer, and they must meet the standard of preponderance of the evidence, meaning that it is more likely than not that the product was defective and caused the injury.
In civil cases like product liability, the standard of proof is preponderance of the evidence. This means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that the product defect caused their injury. Essentially, the consumer needs to show that their version of events is more believable than the defendant’s.
Example: If a consumer sues for injury caused by a defective blender, they need to prove that the defect in the blender was likely the cause of their injury, rather than other possible causes (such as user error or misuse).
Under strict liability, the burden of proof is somewhat reduced for the consumer. In this legal theory, the consumer does not need to prove that the manufacturer or seller was negligent, just that the product was defectively designed or manufactured and that this defect caused the injury.
Example: If a consumer is injured by a defective toy that was defectively designed (e.g., choking hazard), the consumer needs to prove that the toy was defectively designed and caused the injury. The consumer does not need to prove that the manufacturer was negligent in designing the toy.
In a negligence case, the burden of proof is higher. The consumer must prove that the manufacturer or seller was negligent in their duties, such as failing to properly design, manufacture, or warn about the product’s risks. The consumer must show that the manufacturer’s failure to act reasonably directly led to the injury.
Example: If a consumer sues a pharmaceutical company for an injury caused by a defective drug, the consumer must show that the company was negligent in manufacturing or testing the drug, and that this negligence caused their injury.
In a breach of warranty case, the burden of proof focuses on showing that the product failed to meet the implied or express warranties made by the manufacturer. The consumer needs to show that the product did not conform to the stated promises (e.g., it was not fit for its intended use).
Example: If a consumer buys a washing machine that is advertised as being guaranteed to be free from defects, but the machine malfunctions and causes harm, the consumer must prove that the machine’s defect violated the warranty and caused the injury.
In cases involving a design defect, the consumer must prove that the product’s design was inherently dangerous and posed an unreasonable risk of harm. This often requires expert testimony or technical evidence to show that the design was flawed.
Example: A child's car seat designed in a way that fails to meet safety standards might require an expert to testify that the design was inherently unsafe.
In a case involving a manufacturing defect, the consumer must prove that the product deviated from the intended design and that this deviation caused the injury. The burden is to show that the product was defectively manufactured, not just poorly designed.
Example: If a toaster malfunctions and causes injury due to faulty wiring that was incorrectly installed during the manufacturing process, the consumer must prove that the defect in manufacturing caused the injury.
For a warning defect, the consumer must prove that the product lacked sufficient warnings or instructions regarding potential dangers. The burden is to show that the product’s inherent risks were not adequately communicated to the consumer, and that a warning could have prevented the injury.
Example: A cleaning chemical that causes respiratory issues due to inadequate warnings would require the consumer to prove that a proper warning would have prevented the injury.
Defendants (manufacturers, sellers, etc.) may attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the consumer or may raise defenses to dispute the consumer’s claims. These defenses might include:
The manufacturer may argue that the product was used in a manner not intended by the manufacturer, thereby avoiding liability.
The defendant may argue that the consumer altered the product, and the defect was caused by this modification.
The defendant may claim that the consumer was aware of the risk but chose to proceed anyway.
Example: If a consumer modifies a bike to use it for off-road purposes despite warnings against such modifications, the manufacturer may argue that the injury was caused by the consumer’s actions, not the defect.
A consumer is injured by a defective power drill. The consumer sues under strict liability, claiming that the drill was defectively manufactured. In this case, the burden of proof is on the consumer to show:
Since the consumer is suing under strict liability, they do not need to prove that the manufacturer was negligent, only that the drill was defectively made and that this defect led to their injury.
The burden of proof in a product liability case is on the consumer, and they must meet the preponderance of the evidence standard, meaning they must prove it is more likely than not that the product was defective and caused their injury. Depending on the type of defect (design, manufacturing, or warning), the proof required can vary. Under strict liability, the burden is less about proving negligence and more about proving the defect and its direct link to the injury. If the case involves negligence or breach of warranty, the consumer may need to prove that the manufacturer failed to meet certain standards or duties.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Personal Injury Law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
