- 19-Sep-2025
- Elder & Estate Planning law
In long-distance child custody cases, where the custodial parent and child reside far from the non-custodial parent, traditional physical visitation becomes difficult. To bridge this gap, many courts and legal systems are increasingly recognizing video calls (virtual visitation) as a legitimate and effective method to maintain the emotional and psychological bond between the child and the non-custodial parent. While video calls cannot replace face-to-face interactions, they offer a modern solution to maintain contact, especially when geographical separation is a significant barrier.
Indian family law does not have specific statutes that directly address virtual visitation (video calls, phone calls, etc.). However, Indian courts are flexible and can include virtual visitation as part of the custody arrangement or parenting plan in long-distance cases. Judges take into consideration the best interests of the child, and if regular contact with both parents is deemed essential, virtual visitation can be made part of the official custody order.
Indian courts aim to ensure that both parents maintain a relationship with the child, even if one parent is far away. The courts may recommend or mandate regular video call visitation (via platforms like Zoom, Skype, WhatsApp) as part of the overall parenting plan. The non-custodial parent may be allowed to interact with the child through video calls as a way of maintaining regular communication and emotional connection.
The primary factor influencing a court’s decision in custody cases is the best interests of the child. Courts will assess whether video calls are in the child’s emotional and psychological best interests. If a child has a close bond with the non-custodial parent, video calls can help preserve this relationship, especially when physical visits are not possible.
The court will also consider whether both parents have access to the necessary technology for regular video calls. In cases where the custodial parent and child are in rural or remote areas with limited internet connectivity, the court may provide more flexibility or suggest alternatives.
If a court allows video calls as part of visitation, it typically sets clear terms. This could include:
Video calls are often seen as an effective means to maintain continuity in the child's emotional development. Regular interaction with both parents can help the child maintain a sense of security and prevent feelings of abandonment. However, courts also take into account the quality of the interaction and ensure that video calls do not disrupt the child’s routine or cause distress.
While video calls provide an avenue for communication, they are not a perfect substitute for in-person interaction. Younger children, in particular, may have difficulty forming a strong emotional bond through virtual means, and the lack of physical presence may affect the depth of the relationship.
Video calls can sometimes be subject to manipulation or interference, especially if one parent is not cooperative. For instance, a custodial parent may interrupt or control the video call, limiting the non-custodial parent's ability to communicate freely with the child. Courts may need to intervene in such cases to ensure that visitation rights are upheld.
Video calls can be hindered by poor internet connections, especially in remote areas. These technical issues can disrupt the visitation process and prevent regular communication between the child and non-custodial parent.
In several cases, Indian courts have incorporated virtual visitation into custody orders, especially when one parent is residing abroad or in a different city. For instance, the court may issue an order allowing the non-custodial parent to speak to the child on video calls every weekend, ensuring that the child maintains a relationship with both parents.
In international child custody disputes, courts have increasingly recognized the importance of virtual visitation. In situations where one parent lives abroad, video calls are often considered a reasonable alternative to maintain contact, especially in the early stages of separation.
Suppose a father in Delhi has joint custody of his child, but the mother moves to the USA for work. The father is concerned about maintaining a relationship with his child, given the distance. The court, in this case, may include video calls as part of the father's visitation rights.
The father files a petition to ensure that regular video calls are part of the custody arrangement.
The court evaluates the child’s emotional attachment to the father and deems regular video calls as beneficial.
The court issues an order allowing the father to have video calls with the child every weekend, ensuring continuity in their relationship.
Both parents ensure the child is available for the calls and that the calls happen at a mutually convenient time.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Marriage and Divorce Laws. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
