- 30-Sep-2025
- public international law
An interim award is a temporary decision issued by an arbitral tribunal during the course of arbitration to provide provisional relief before the final resolution of the dispute. These awards are typically aimed at preserving the status quo, securing the rights of the parties, or addressing urgent matters that cannot wait until the final award is rendered. The interim award does not resolve the main issues of the dispute but offers a temporary measure until the final award is issued.
An interim award is a temporary or provisional decision issued by an arbitral tribunal in the middle of the arbitration proceedings. Unlike a final award, which resolves the entire dispute, an interim award only addresses urgent or provisional matters that require immediate attention.
An interim award does not determine the substantive rights of the parties or conclude the arbitration; instead, it provides temporary relief on specific issues, such as the preservation of assets, the granting of injunctions, or security for costs.
The final award is the conclusive decision that resolves all issues between the parties and brings the arbitration process to an end. It is typically binding and enforceable in national courts.
A partial award resolves part of the dispute, such as determining liability or specific claims, but does not end the arbitration. It addresses specific issues while leaving others unresolved.
An interim award is issued before the final award and addresses only urgent or provisional issues. It can order temporary relief such as a stay of proceedings, injunctive relief, or security for costs, but it does not resolve the main dispute.
When one party needs immediate protection for its rights, an interim award may be issued to prevent harm that could occur before the final award. For example, a tribunal may issue an interim award to prevent the destruction or dissipation of assets or to stop an action that could make the final award unenforceable.
Example: If a company is concerned that the other party might dissipate assets to avoid paying a future award, the tribunal may order the freezing of assets or an injunction.
When the parties need to maintain the existing situation until the final award is issued, an interim award can help preserve the status quo. For example, an interim award may direct the continuation of contractual obligations pending the final resolution of a breach of contract claim.
Example: If a dispute arises over the performance of a contract, an interim award might require one party to continue performing specific contractual duties until the tribunal issues the final award.
In certain cases, an interim award may order a party to provide security for costs, ensuring that the winning party can recover its costs if it prevails in the dispute.
Example: If a claimant is at risk of not being able to pay the costs of the arbitration, the tribunal may issue an interim award requiring the claimant to provide a bond or guarantee.
In some cases, the tribunal may issue an interim award to grant an injunction or provisional order to prevent harm or irreparable damage while the arbitration is ongoing.
Example: In a case involving intellectual property, the tribunal might issue an interim award preventing one party from using patented technology until the final decision is made.
An interim award may order a party to do or refrain from doing something temporarily, such as stopping an infringing action or preventing the sale of assets.
The tribunal may issue an interim award directing a party to preserve specific evidence, such as documents or digital records, that may be crucial for the resolution of the dispute.
A party may be required to provide a financial guarantee or deposit to secure the costs of the arbitration, especially if the tribunal fears that the party may not be able to pay the costs in case of an unfavorable decision.
The tribunal may order a party to freeze certain assets or take specific actions to prevent asset dissipation or other measures that could frustrate the final award.
An interim award may order a party to make temporary payments, such as maintenance or support payments, during the arbitration process.
While interim awards are legally binding, their enforceability can depend on the jurisdiction. Some jurisdictions recognize and enforce interim awards issued by arbitral tribunals, while others may require the party seeking enforcement to apply to a national court to confirm the award.
If a party refuses to comply with an interim award, the other party may seek enforcement through national courts. In many countries, the courts will recognize and enforce arbitral interim awards, especially if they align with national law or international treaties like the New York Convention.
Example: In some jurisdictions, an interim award requiring a party to refrain from certain actions may be enforced by a national court through an injunction or other legal mechanism.
The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, ICC Rules, LCIA Rules, and other institutional rules typically allow for interim awards. These rules provide the tribunal with the authority to issue such awards to provide provisional relief before the final resolution of the dispute.
The Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 also recognizes the possibility of interim relief in arbitration and allows the tribunal to issue interim orders before the final award is issued.
The rules of other arbitral institutions, such as the LCIA or SIAC, also provide mechanisms for issuing interim awards.
A party may challenge an interim award if the tribunal exceeded its powers, if the award violates public policy, or if there are issues with the tribunal's procedure. However, the grounds for challenging an interim award are narrower compared to a final award.
Interim awards are often less likely to be appealed or set aside because they are not final decisions and do not address the entire dispute. Instead, they are designed to protect the parties' rights during the ongoing arbitration process.
Example: A party may challenge an interim award ordering the freezing of assets on the grounds that the tribunal exceeded its powers or violated due process principles.
Global Enterprises Ltd. (claimant) and Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) are involved in a commercial dispute regarding a technology licensing agreement. The claimant alleges that the respondent is using its proprietary technology without authorization.
The claimant fears that the respondent may transfer assets or sell intellectual property to avoid paying any potential award.
The tribunal issues an interim award ordering Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. to freeze its assets and refrain from transferring any intellectual property related to the disputed technology until the final award is issued.
The tribunal also orders Techno Solutions to provide security for costs, ensuring that the claimant can recover arbitration expenses in case of a favorable decision.
An interim award is a temporary decision issued by an arbitral tribunal during the arbitration process to address urgent or provisional matters. It provides immediate relief and helps preserve the status quo while the arbitration continues. Interim awards are legally binding and enforceable in many jurisdictions, although their enforceability can vary. They are different from final or partial awards, as they do not resolve the entire dispute but focus on specific issues requiring immediate attention.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
