- 09-Nov-2025
- public international law
Extradition is usually governed by formal treaties between countries. However, India, like many other nations, may seek the return of fugitives even from countries with which it has no extradition treaty. In such cases, diplomatic efforts, international cooperation, and the principle of reciprocity come into play. While more challenging and uncertain than treaty-based extradition, extradition from non-treaty countries is legally possible under specific conditions.
India can send an ad hoc extradition request for a specific individual based on the seriousness of the offense. The requested country is not obligated to comply but may choose to cooperate based on mutual interests or legal considerations.
Even without a treaty, a country may honor India’s request as a goodwill gesture, especially if India agrees to reciprocate in the future. This informal understanding is known as the principle of reciprocity.
The Indian government, through the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), initiates high-level diplomatic dialogue. Embassies and consulates play a crucial role in negotiating with foreign counterparts.
India may issue a Red Corner Notice (RCN) through INTERPOL, alerting all member countries. If the fugitive is detained in a non-treaty country, India can then formally request extradition through diplomatic and legal means.
If an MLAT exists, India can request cooperation in investigation or provisional detention, which may lead to extradition even without a direct extradition treaty.
Some countries allow extradition even in the absence of a treaty, depending on their internal laws and the nature of the offense (e.g., terrorism, organized crime, child trafficking).
The requested country is not legally bound to honor India’s request, leading to a higher rate of rejection or delay.
Differences in legal systems, human rights concerns, or geopolitical tensions can hinder cooperation.
Each country may have different requirements for documentation, proof of crime, or judicial oversight, increasing complexity.
The fugitive may seek asylum or claim persecution in India, complicating the extradition process further.
India can raise the issue in international forums like the UN or G20 to apply diplomatic pressure in high-profile cases.
India may initiate talks to establish a formal extradition treaty if repeated cases arise from the same country.
In some instances, countries may deport a fugitive on immigration or visa violation grounds, bypassing full extradition procedures.
Indian legal teams may present cases directly in foreign courts to support extradition based on fairness and gravity of offense.
Collect strong, admissible evidence before initiating a request.
Use diplomatic backchannels for informal assurance before sending a formal extradition note.
Be aware of the requested country's human rights standards and legal framework.
Include translated legal documents and detailed case files.
Explore immigration violations as an alternative route for deportation.
Suppose an economic offender from India is found residing in a country like Saudi Arabia, which does not have a formal extradition treaty with India.
Issue INTERPOL Red Notice: CBI sends a request to INTERPOL to issue a Red Corner Notice against the fugitive.
Diplomatic Engagement: The MEA engages with Saudi Arabian officials through the Indian embassy, requesting extradition based on the gravity of the offense.
Submission of Case File: India prepares a strong case file, including charges, arrest warrants, and supporting evidence, translated into Arabic.
Principle of Reciprocity Invoked: Indian diplomats assure Saudi Arabia of future cooperation on similar matters.
Outcome: While not guaranteed, Saudi Arabia may choose to deport the fugitive based on immigration violations or honor the extradition request as a gesture of goodwill.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
