India's extradition system strives to uphold international cooperation in criminal matters while simultaneously safeguarding fundamental rights and legal fairness for individuals. The Extradition Act, 1962, along with judicial interpretations, defines explicit grounds where extradition requests can be rejected to prevent misuse, injustice, or violation of human rights.
India refuses extradition if the alleged crime is political, such as treason, sedition, rebellion, or acts motivated by political dissent or ideology.
This is to prevent persecution of political opponents or activists under the guise of criminal charges.
Courts examine the true nature of the offense to distinguish political acts from common crimes.
If the requested extradition involves the possibility of the death penalty, India may refuse extradition unless the requesting country provides assurances that capital punishment will not be carried out.
Similarly, extradition may be denied if the individual faces torture, cruel, or degrading treatment in the requesting country.
Extradition requires that the act be a crime punishable under the laws of both India and the requesting country.
If the offense is not recognized as criminal in India, extradition can be refused.
India may deny extradition if there is a credible risk that the person will not receive a fair trial or may be discriminated against based on race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, or political beliefs.
Protection against persecution aligns with India’s commitment to human rights.
The requesting country must provide sufficient prima facie evidence to establish a credible case against the fugitive.
Lack of proper legal documentation, such as certified copies of warrants, charge sheets, or proof of offense, may lead to refusal.
If the offense falls outside the statute of limitations as per Indian law, the extradition request may be rejected on this ground.
While India can extradite without a treaty, many requests are based on existing treaties or arrangements.
If no treaty exists, or if conditions in the treaty are not met, India may refuse extradition.
Extradition can be denied if it is deemed contrary to the public policy or sovereignty of India.
For example, extradition may be refused if the fugitive is an Indian citizen (some treaties exclude this), or if the offense is considered minor or trivial under Indian standards.
Serious health conditions or humanitarian reasons may also lead to refusal or delay in extradition.
A country requests extradition of a journalist accused of sedition and publishing anti-government content. The Indian courts review the case and reject the request citing political offense exception and concerns over potential persecution and violation of free speech rights.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
