In India, the extradition process involves multiple stages of legal and administrative review, but the ultimate authority to approve or deny an extradition request rests with the Central Government. Courts play a critical role in examining the legality and evidence, but the final executive decision is made by the government.
The magistrate conducts the extradition inquiry, verifying if the request meets legal requirements and if there is a prima facie case.
Courts ensure that the fugitive’s rights are protected and the law is followed but do not make the final decision on surrender.
Under the Extradition Act, 1962, the Central Government, primarily through the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), holds the power to grant or refuse extradition.
The government considers the magistrate’s report, diplomatic factors, international relations, and legal safeguards before deciding.
Once the Central Government approves, arrangements are made for surrender.
Although courts can entertain appeals or judicial review, the executive government’s decision on extradition is the conclusive step.
When Country Z requests extradition of a person from India, the magistrate conducts a hearing and submits the report confirming prima facie grounds. However, the Central Government reviews this report and, considering diplomatic and legal factors, makes the final decision to either approve or reject the extradition request.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
