Law4u - Made in India

What was the significance of the Vishaka Guidelines?

16-Aug-2025
Supreme Court

Answer By law4u team

The Vishaka Guidelines were significant because they were the first formal framework in India to address sexual harassment of women at the workplace. Key points of their significance: They were laid down by the Supreme Court of India in 1997 in Vishaka & Others v. State of Rajasthan after the gangrape of social worker Bhanwari Devi. Filled a legal gap – At that time, there was no specific law on sexual harassment at work in India. Defined “sexual harassment” clearly and recognized it as a violation of women’s fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution. Made it mandatory for employers to prevent and address sexual harassment, including creating Complaints Committees with a woman chairperson and an NGO member. Had the force of law until Parliament enacted the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, which was largely based on these guidelines. In short, the Vishaka Guidelines were a landmark step that recognized workplace sexual harassment as a human rights violation and created binding rules in the absence of legislation.

Answer By Anik

Dear Client, In 1997 the Supreme Court of India put forth the Vishaka Guidelines which were a large scale evolution of legal parameters to support women’s rights and workplace safety. These included: Filling a Legal Vacuum: At present there wasn't a dedicated law in India which dealt with sexual harassment in the workplace. What we had were insufficient laws which at times put victims forward to file reports under broad based sections of the Indian Penal Code which in fact didn’t pay specific attention to this issue. The Vishaka Guidelines came in to play at this void by putting forth a concrete framework for prevention and resolution of sexual harassment. Defining Sexual Harassment: In India the guidelines which put forth the first official definition of “sexual harassment”. The definition was broad which it applied to a range of unsolicited acts which include physical contact and advances, requests for sexual favors, sexual comments, display of pornographic material, and also any other unsolicited physical, verbal or non verbal sexual behavior. This definition was key in the identification and pursuit of these cases. Placing Responsibility on Employers: The guidelines which made it a requirement of all employers in the public and private sectors to take pro active measures to put an end to sexual harassment which in turn shifted the responsibility from the individual victim to the organization. Also the issue was brought home to the large scale as that is where the policy bit. Employers now had to: Create a safe working environment. Establish an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) for those issues. Notify of and put out the info on what is allowed and what isn't in terms of sexual harassment. Take action against offenders at the same time see to it that victims and witnesses are not. If the action is a crime assist the victim in filing a report. Paving the Way for Legislation: The Supreme Court put forth that the guidelines were a temporary measure which asked the government to introduce a proper law. In the case of Vishaka Guidelines they served as the base for the passage of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. Although the Act is more in depth, the guidelines were the key initial step which brought the issue into the open and which created the legal and institutional structures that were later made into a formal law. Originating from a Social Movement: In a response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a number of women’s groups and NGOs which came to be known as “Vishaka” in the wake of the brutal gang rape of Bhanwari Devi a social worker which she was doing away with child marriage the guidelines were put in place. This case brought to light the issue of working women’s lack of protection and the Supreme Court’s judgment was a response to that social demand for justice and safety. I hope this helps you out with your issues, do not hesitate to ask more. Thank you!

Supreme Court Verified Advocates

Get expert legal advice instantly.

Advocate Piyush Singh

Advocate Piyush Singh

Revenue, Wills Trusts, Trademark & Copyright, Supreme Court, Civil, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Family, High Court, Immigration, Insurance, Media and Entertainment, Patent, Property, Startup, RERA, Recovery, Criminal

Get Advice
Advocate Pradeep K Sharma(upadhayay)

Advocate Pradeep K Sharma(upadhayay)

Civil, Criminal, High Court, Property, Revenue, Anticipatory Bail, Cheque Bounce, Banking & Finance, Labour & Service, Supreme Court

Get Advice
Advocate Raja Prasad

Advocate Raja Prasad

Cheque Bounce,Civil,GST,High Court,Supreme Court,Tax,

Get Advice
Advocate Ravi Mehta

Advocate Ravi Mehta

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Labour & Service, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, NCLT, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, Succession Certificate, Supreme Court, Tax

Get Advice
Advocate Sandip Kaushal

Advocate Sandip Kaushal

Criminal, Civil, High Court, Family, R.T.I, Supreme Court, Arbitration

Get Advice
Advocate Javed Ahmad

Advocate Javed Ahmad

Criminal, Family, Domestic Violence, Supreme Court, High Court

Get Advice
Advocate Zuber Chauhan

Advocate Zuber Chauhan

Anticipatory Bail,Banking & Finance,Cheque Bounce,Child Custody,Consumer Court,Court Marriage,Criminal,Cyber Crime,Divorce,Documentation,GST,Domestic Violence,Family,High Court,Insurance,Labour & Service,Media and Entertainment,Medical Negligence,Motor Accident,Muslim Law,R.T.I,Startup,Succession Certificate,Supreme Court,Tax,Trademark & Copyright,Wills Trusts,

Get Advice
Advocate D Vijay

Advocate D Vijay

Anticipatory Bail, Armed Forces Tribunal, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Customs & Central Excise, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Insurance, Labour & Service, Landlord & Tenant, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Patent, Property, Recovery, Succession Certificate, Supreme Court, Tax, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Revenue, R.T.I, Muslim Law, Criminal

Get Advice
Advocate Sunil Tindal

Advocate Sunil Tindal

Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, Banking & Finance, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Court Marriage, Criminal, Cyber Crime, Divorce, Documentation, GST, Domestic Violence, Family, High Court, Landlord & Tenant, Insurance, Immigration, Labour & Service, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, Succession Certificate, Wills Trusts, Trademark & Copyright, Tax, Supreme Court, Revenue, Startup, NCLT, Patent, RERA, Customs & Central Excise, Breach of Contract, Corporate

Get Advice
Advocate Prabhat Chaudhary

Advocate Prabhat Chaudhary

High Court, Anticipatory Bail, Arbitration, Armed Forces Tribunal, Breach of Contract, Cheque Bounce, Child Custody, Civil, Consumer Court, Corporate, Court Marriage, Customs & Central Excise, Criminal, Divorce, Documentation, Cyber Crime, Domestic Violence, Family, Immigration, Property, R.T.I, Recovery, Patent, Motor Accident, Muslim Law, Media and Entertainment, Medical Negligence, Succession Certificate, Trademark & Copyright, Wills Trusts, Supreme Court, Tax, Revenue, Insurance, International Law, Landlord & Tenant, Labour & Service, Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy & Insolvency, GST, NCLT, RERA, Startup

Get Advice

Supreme Court Related Questions

Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Breach of Contract. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.